Sunday, December 28, 2008

Warmongers


What do we have to show for the $3 trillion, the 4,200 Americans lives, and the 95,000 Iraqi civilians sacrificed in the Iraq war? The end of a brutal dictatorship, a brighter future in Iraq, a more secure America, and a few barrels of oil? What a terrible price to pay for such trivial things! Democracy isn't worth a single drop of blood, and if we would put up a few windmills and inflate our tires properly, we could do without Iraqi oil. Just think about how many free abortions could have been provided with the money spent killing people in Iraq.

Peace-lovers all over the world have been looking forward to the end of the Bush regime. The day has almost arrived. In a few short weeks, the warmonger-in-chief will be gone forever. But now is not the time to rest on our laurels. We must end the careers and assassinate the characters of all of his warmongering accomplices in order to put an end to their evil machinations. Here are some comments from some of Bush's bloodthirsty friends.
  • "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." Hillary Clinton (warmonger), October 10, 2002. We must not allow Hillary Clinton to become Secretary of State!
  • "The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." Bill Clinton (warmonger), 1998. Do not contribute to the William J. Clinton foundation or do business with anyone who does (e.g. Bill Gates, Elton John, the Government of Norway, the State of Kuwait, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, & the Alltel Corporation).
  • "The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." John Edwards (warmonger), Oct 10, 2002. Don't let John Edwards out of the doghouse!
  • "Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore (warmonger), 2002. Boycott Al Gore's carbon credit scheme.
  • "There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." Ted Kennedy (warmonger), Sept 27, 2002. Just say no to Ted Kennedy (and Caroline for that matter).
  • "As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Nancy Pelosi (warmonger), December 16, 1998. The speaker of the House must go!


More

Miracle: My angry comment was posted on Chrysler's blog. Looks like I'm not the only one.

Time to let John Edwards out of the doghouse? I don't think so.

Rich people apparently love Bill Clinton.

If The Bush Administration Lied About WMD, So Did These People

Sen. Reid in Uphill Re-Election Bid.

Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.


7 comments:

Thru My Eyes said...

Well , to the 52% of stupids out there, that "Feel" we should try and understand the hurt feelings of the retarded 7th century religion, I say this. It is high time we had another Crusade to shove these cockroaches back under the rock from which they came. I can see why the idiot Libs love them. They are whiners and complainers just like Libs, they are miserable, just like Libs, they are mean and nasty, just like Libs, it's their way or the highway, just like Libs, and they go all out to destroy anyone that isn't like them, just like Libs. God will need to protect Israel, cause you just know, the Libs won't. No, they'll be negotiating with the scum behind Israels back like they always do.
There's only one way to deal with Hamas and all other terrorists, Destroy them completely

Critical Thinker said...

They are never happy are they?

Humble wife said...

Well thanks for voicing the opinion that so many of us agree with.

Jennifer
penofjen

4simpsons said...

Great timing, thanks! I was just making this point on a blog this morning but didn't have the quotes handy.

robert verdi said...

we did our part and the made the world better. It was tough but it worked, and the left fought us every step of the way.

-suitepotato- said...

They only got on the bandwagon for war with Iraq when the public seemed they would go for it and they didn't want to be on the wrong side of public opinion. When the public predictably changed their opinion as the war went on, so did these flag chasers.

Dante had something to say about them spending eternity just outside the first circle of Hell.

The reality is that they just want attention from a public whose attention is of more than questionable and beyond dubious value.

It makes you wonder whether the public is more retarded for their flash bang opinions formed at a snap of the finger without any caring or understanding of what they're are opining on, or, the people who crave that public's adoration.

And while some might view it as condescending, they are retarded, abysmally so. You cannot fix a problem by ignoring or denying it no matter how you detest it but only by embracing it so as to take it in hand and work on it.

The solution then is to educate and enlighten the public, but given that you first have to break them of their deeply psychologically screwed up conceptions and instincts first to even get them to approach true reality honestly, the work is quite cut out for you.

As the left has found, subversion through near subliminal and almost omnipresent information conveyance is the way the best changes a society without firing a shot.

As more popular media and cultural entertainment encodes more sensible conservative ideas, or even just somewhat less leftist ideas, so too will the people over time change.

Then things like that list will matter. Hand it to people screaming at you about the evil of Republican warmongers, and they will if they read it, toss it aside and ignore it as if the information never crossed them. They have to be acclimated to accepting it even as being possible first. Shouting will do nothing.

Though your sarcasm is enjoyable.

DaBlade said...

Oh sure! Throw "facts" around and ruin my day why don'tcha. I'm going back to the huffing-glue post, where their propaganda is so soothing and hypnotically sedative... goodnight. Zzzzzzzzzzz