Obama Wins 2nd Biennial Anti-Bush Award

This story is an utter waste of time. Obama is busy losing the war in Afghanistan and winning the war against freedom and liberty in the U.S., but instead of discussing real issues, we're talking about another botched decision of a bunch of leftist Norwegians.

The Nobel Peace Prize was a joke long before today's award. Let's review some of the recent laureates:

2009 - Barack Obama

2007 - Al Gore

2005 - International Atomic Energy Agency

2002 - Jimmy Carter

2001 - Kofi Annan

1994 - Yasser Arafat

Notably absent from the list: John Kerry and Bill Clinton. Maybe in 2011?

The Brits react: "Rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan intent. It was clearly seen by the Norwegian Nobel committee as a way of expressing European gratitude for an end to the Bush Administration..."

This is not the first time the Norwegian Nobel committee has been accused of dispensing a prize on the basis of anti-Bush sentiment. The first Biennial Anti-Bush Nobel Prize went to Al Gore. Again, the Brits nail it: "The decision has inevitably been interpreted as a rebuke to President Bush, who beat Mr Gore by the narrowest of margins to win the White House in 2000..."

The Nobel Peace Prize traditionally goes to corrupt and inept leftists, so in that sense, this year's decision was right on the money. What's surprising about the decision to award Obama with the Nobel Peace Prize is that he is a corrupt and inept leftist with so few accomplishments (save for his courageous stance in support of leftist tyranny in Honduras).

The Norwegian Nobel Committee's deadline for nominations was February 1, just 11 days after Obama's inauguration.

via Memeorandum

Discussion: LCR, ABC, Track-a-crat, Amusing Bunni

More

Meet the People Who Were Passed Over for Obama

Eleven days of extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.

Absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize, h/t: Memeorandum

The Nobel Prize For Not Being George Bush

How the Nobel Peace Prize Is Awarded

Americans don’t want end zone celebrations until they see some touchdowns.

Stranded

Reading

Illinois Supreme Court says Secretary of State Jesse White doesn't need to sign Roland Burris' appointment to the U.S. Senate to make it valid.

Shocking Huffpost perspective: Mr. Gore, Apology Accepted.  Hat tip: 4Simpsons

Andre Thomas, Texas Death Row Inmate, Pulls Out Eye, Eats it

An Emergency Review

Online Surveys & Market Research

An Inconvenient Environment

You're an environmentally responsible individual, so you do your best to live greenly and leave a small carbon footprint.  But making green decisions isn't always easy. Is it greener to walk, ride or bicycle or take the bus? Should you use traditional diapers or disposables?  Should you use paper or plastic?  Are you helping the environment when you plant a tree?  Think you know the answers?  Don't be so sure...you may not be as environmentally intelligent as you think.

Don't worry, RightKlik is here to help.  Let's get to the heart of the matter.  Environmental responsibility boils down to one thing: reducing your carbon footprint.  In the U.S. we produce about 7.5 tons of carbon per human being per year.  So what's good for the environment and what's bad?  Glad you asked:

• Bad: Having children.  Another kid, another 7.5 tons of carbon per year.
  
• Good: Abortions.  Fewer kids, less carbon.
  
• Bad: Heterosexual marriage.  An ill-conceived institution that leads to increased carbon production through human population growth.
  
• Good: Traffic accidents.  Destroying carbon-belching automobiles and their human drivers simultaneously...what could be better?
  
• Bad: Health care.  Longer life equates to more carbon emissions.  Universal health care will be one of the biggest environmental tragedies of all time.
  
• Good: Hurricanes.  Kills people, destroys their communities, and shuts down local economies...a big win for the environment.

Human beings are the number one source of man-made carbon emissions.  Want to get serious about reducing carbon emissions?  Drop dead!  Literally.  I'm not kidding.

Interesting Links: A Jumbo Pack!

Global cooling, global warming, pesticides, alar on apples, falling sperm counts from endocrine disrupters, cancer from power lines, cancer from saccharine, cancer from cell phones, cancer from computer screens, cancer from food coloring, hair spray, electric razors, electric blankets, coffee, chlorinated water…it never seems to end!  A good article for the worriers, hypchondriacs and environmental alarmists in your life. 

A new spin on centrifugal force.

A new spin on angular momentum.

Obama: We Must Act Now. Obama Tries to Build Bipartisan Support for Stimulus.  Everything comes with a price, Obama.  How much will our children pay for your ambitions? 

Funny Business in Minnesota...In which every dubious ruling seems to help Al Franken.

I fear this election season marks the sad end of American democracy as we know it. May the most merciful thug win!

We desperately need 600,000 New Federal Employees.

"What are you doing here?": man asks wife at brothel

The Reuters Fauxtography Scandal: A Taxonomy of Fraud

Keeping Cool with Coolidge.  We are entering a time when the American president is simultaneously the sole arbiter of good and bad in the universe, a fashion plate, a paparazzi-attracting celebrity and a pop art icon...

Stay childless and save the environment.

Every child left behind.

Global Swarming: Is it time for Americans to start cutting our baby emissions?

Calculate your impact with Al Gore's carbon calculator.  This is why he invented the Internet.

Walking to the shops ‘damages planet more than going by car’

Warmongers

What do we have to show for the $3 trillion, the 4,200 Americans lives, and the 95,000 Iraqi civilians sacrificed in the Iraq war? The end of a brutal dictatorship, a brighter future in Iraq, a more secure America, and a few barrels of oil? What a terrible price to pay for such trivial things! Democracy isn't worth a single drop of blood, and if we would put up a few windmills and inflate our tires properly, we could do without Iraqi oil. Just think about how many free abortions could have been provided with the money spent killing people in Iraq.

Peace-lovers all over the world have been looking forward to the end of the Bush regime. The day has almost arrived. In a few short weeks, the warmonger-in-chief will be gone forever. But now is not the time to rest on our laurels. We must end the careers and assassinate the characters of all of his warmongering accomplices in order to put an end to their evil machinations. Here are some comments from some of Bush's bloodthirsty friends.

• "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." — Hillary Clinton (warmonger), October 10, 2002. We must not allow Hillary Clinton to become Secretary of State!

• "The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." — Bill Clinton (warmonger), 1998. Do not contribute to the William J. Clinton foundation or do business with anyone who does (e.g. Bill Gates, Elton John, the Government of Norway, the State of Kuwait, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, & the Alltel Corporation).
  

• "The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." — John Edwards (warmonger), Oct 10, 2002. Don't let John Edwards out of the doghouse!

• "Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." — Al Gore (warmonger), 2002. Boycott Al Gore's carbon credit scheme.

• "There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." — Ted Kennedy (warmonger), Sept 27, 2002. Just say no to Ted Kennedy (and Caroline for that matter).

• "As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." — Nancy Pelosi (warmonger), December 16, 1998. The speaker of the House must go!
  

More

Miracle: My angry comment was posted on Chrysler's blog. Looks like I'm not the only one.

Time to let John Edwards out of the doghouse? I don't think so.

Rich people apparently love Bill Clinton.

If The Bush Administration Lied About WMD, So Did These People

Sen. Reid in Uphill Re-Election Bid.

Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.