The Democrats' War on Women UPDATE: Video Added

Where would the Dems be without their celebrated misogynists?

True story.

Unfortunately Bill Clinton's old friend, Juanita Broaddrick, will not be in attendance at the DNC for Bill Clinton's keynote tonight. Mary Jo Kopechne would have understood.

Update: Dems give up their war on God and Israel, but not without an ugly fight (video added).

GOP Following Ted Kennedy's "Moral Conviction" Tradition

An excellent point from Red Mass Group: In their quest to eliminate freedom of choice in health care, Democrats are moving to the left of Ted Kennedy...

The progressive movement is in an all out war on the so called Blunt Amendment and Scott Brown's push for it. They are hitting at the phrase "moral conviction" as a code word for all people to stop providing birth control coverage. Jim Braude hit Brown repeatedly last night with this phrase.

The problem for the left is this is the exact same language used by Ted Kennedy to define a conscience clause. In 1994 and 1995 Ted Kennedy introduced health care bills. Both of which had seemingly identical language regarding a moral conviction clause:

"A Health Professional Or A Health Facility May Not Be Required To Provide An Item Or Service In The Comprehensive Benefit Package If The Professional Or Facility Objects To Doing So On The Basis Of A Religious Belief Or Moral Conviction." (S. 2296, Introduced 7/19/94)

"A Health Professional Or A Health Facility May Not Be Required To Provide An Item Or Service Under A Certified Health Plan If The Professional Or Facility Objects To Doing So On The Basis Of A Religious Belief Or Moral Conviction." (S. 168, Introduced 1/5/95)

The KosKids say that the Blount amendment goes beyond the Religious Freedom argument, by including a moral conviction clause.

In Obama's Democrat Party, your inalienable "right" to popular health care amenities is more important than anything guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.

Hat tip: Mike Stopa

ObamaCare Will Die on January 19

ObamaCare will die on January 19...if we put Scott Brown (R) in Ted Kennedy's old Senate seat.

We don't have to sit around and hope that some corrupt blue dog will finally listen to his constituents and change his position on the health care bill.

We don't have to hope that ObamaCare is ripped to shreds by warring factions of the Democrat party.

We don't have to hope that the Democrats will finally come to their senses and shift their focus to urgent priorities (like national security and the faltering economy).

We don't have to hope that somebody in Congress will get bored and actually read the U.S. Constitution for the first time.

No, we don't have to hope for change. We can rise up and attack ObamaCare proactively. We can actively contribute to the effort to give the Republicans the power to filibuster this shameful fiasco, defeating ObamaCare once and for all.

There's a ton of EXCELLENT information about this race that I want to share with you. Please read, share and ― if you can ― contribute.

Coverage from the Left:

Daily Kos: Martha Coakley is so far from the best the state has to offer, it would be tragic to see her in the senate.

Left Bank of the Charles: Seven Reasons Martha Coakley Will Never Get Our Vote

KennedySeat.com: "Different People, Same Message." Scott Brown's smart TV ad

The New Republic: The Dems have gone hysterical. Maybe their panic is apt.

Coverage from the Right:

Michelle Malkin's viral post: Fight the SEIU & Demcare corruption...Support Scott Brown for Senate

Red State: Has Martha Coakley's river of money dried up?

Patrick Ruffini: Evidence Scott Brown is Within Single Digits in Massachusetts

Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: Martha Coakley's Political House On Fire

WSJ: A GOP upset in Taxachusetts?

The Next Right: The mammoth significance of this race...if Brown wins, Obamacare is dead.

Erick Erickson: Republican Unicorns and Reality

Sissy Willis: Let's make Scott Brown's Senate race a "referendum on Obamacare"

Atlas Shrugs: Wanna Stop Obama's Marxist Coup? Get Behind Scott Brown

The Other McCain: Scott Brown Is Running — and Martha Coakley’s Hiding

Riehl World View: Why Is Coakley Hiding Out?

Boston Herald: ACORN's biggest nut! When you think "Martha Coakley" think "ACORN."

Save WRKO: He’s REALLY Getting To Her

NorsU: The most comprehensive coverage of the Massachusetts Senate race on Twitter.

RightKlik: Nationalize every senate race. Get Congress off your back. Get "progressives" out of your face…

Michelle Malkin talks about Martha Coakley's corruption and Scott Brown's spontaneous grassroots support:

Warmongers

What do we have to show for the $3 trillion, the 4,200 Americans lives, and the 95,000 Iraqi civilians sacrificed in the Iraq war? The end of a brutal dictatorship, a brighter future in Iraq, a more secure America, and a few barrels of oil? What a terrible price to pay for such trivial things! Democracy isn't worth a single drop of blood, and if we would put up a few windmills and inflate our tires properly, we could do without Iraqi oil. Just think about how many free abortions could have been provided with the money spent killing people in Iraq.

Peace-lovers all over the world have been looking forward to the end of the Bush regime. The day has almost arrived. In a few short weeks, the warmonger-in-chief will be gone forever. But now is not the time to rest on our laurels. We must end the careers and assassinate the characters of all of his warmongering accomplices in order to put an end to their evil machinations. Here are some comments from some of Bush's bloodthirsty friends.

• "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." — Hillary Clinton (warmonger), October 10, 2002. We must not allow Hillary Clinton to become Secretary of State!

• "The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." — Bill Clinton (warmonger), 1998. Do not contribute to the William J. Clinton foundation or do business with anyone who does (e.g. Bill Gates, Elton John, the Government of Norway, the State of Kuwait, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, & the Alltel Corporation).
  

• "The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." — John Edwards (warmonger), Oct 10, 2002. Don't let John Edwards out of the doghouse!

• "Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." — Al Gore (warmonger), 2002. Boycott Al Gore's carbon credit scheme.

• "There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." — Ted Kennedy (warmonger), Sept 27, 2002. Just say no to Ted Kennedy (and Caroline for that matter).

• "As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." — Nancy Pelosi (warmonger), December 16, 1998. The speaker of the House must go!
  

More

Miracle: My angry comment was posted on Chrysler's blog. Looks like I'm not the only one.

Time to let John Edwards out of the doghouse? I don't think so.

Rich people apparently love Bill Clinton.

If The Bush Administration Lied About WMD, So Did These People

Sen. Reid in Uphill Re-Election Bid.

Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.