Showing posts with label Bobby Jindal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bobby Jindal. Show all posts

Friday, August 10, 2012

Bobby Jindal for VP

Let's talk about VP options.

Disclaimer: I've been promoting Bobby Jindal since the earliest days of my odysseys in blogging, and I own Bobby Jindal clothing. But that's only because it's hard to think of anyone better than Jindal in terms of proven executive success and heartfelt small-government conservatism.

Please take note of the fact that even the wily RINO squish Allahpundit cannot wiggle out of the inescapable logic of choosing Jindal for VP:
He’s probably the one guy out there more than any other who would satisfy virtually everyone in the Republican galaxy. As Matt Lewis put it:


T-Paw is “meh,” Portman is a Bush guy, Ryan is an invitation to Mediscaring — but what’s Jindal’s big liability? He’s smart as a whip, respected by grassroots conservatives and righty intellectuals, has had plenty of executive experience, brings youth and racial/geographic diversity to the ticket, and on and on and on. The only arguments against him are that he endorsed Perry in the primary, gave a flat response to the State of the Union a few years ago, and once wrote about an exorcism he witnessed decades ago. So what?
Think about it.


Friday, June 26, 2009

Weakest Link: Round 7

Ron Paul eliminated in Round 1
Newt Gingrich and Charlie Crist eliminated in Round 2
Mike Huckabee eliminated in Round 3
John Thune eliminated in Round 4
Eric Cantor eliminated in Round 5
Mark Sanford eliminated himself in Round 6

Round 7

Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 22, 2009

Weakest Link: Round 6

Ron Paul eliminated in Round 1
Newt Gingrich and Charlie Crist eliminated in Round 2
Mike Huckabee eliminated in Round 3
John Thune eliminated in Round 4
Eric Cantor eliminated in Round 5

Round 6

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Weakest Link: Round 4


Ron Paul eliminated in Round 1
Newt Gingrich and Charlie Crist eliminated in Round 2
Mike Huckabee eliminated in Round 3

Round 4

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Weakest Link: Round 3


Ron Paul eliminated in Round 1
Newt Gingrich and Charlie Crist eliminated in Round 2

Round 3

Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 8, 2009

Beating Obama — Round 2


Ron Paul eliminated in Round 1

Round 2

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Replacing a Cowboy With a Crybaby


Bush's "cowboy diplomacy" was relentlessly derided by liberals. One of their favorite churlish refrains: "Yeehaw! is not a foreign policy." They said we needed to restore America's reputation and leadership, so they gave us the gift of Obama. Note to Obama worshipers — Obama is not off to a good start.


Obama 'too tired' to give proper welcome to Gordon Brown

Barack Obama's offhand approach to Gordon Brown's Washington visit last week came about because the president was facing exhaustion over America's economic crisis and is unable to focus on foreign affairs. Sources close to the White House say Mr. Obama and his staff have been "overwhelmed"...and have voiced concerns that the new president is not getting enough rest.

British officials admit that Obama aides seemed unfamiliar with the expectations that surround a major visit by a British prime minister. A well-connected Washington figure, who is close to members of Mr Obama's inner circle, expressed concern that Mr Obama had failed so far to "even fake an interest in foreign policy".

British diplomats insist the visit was a success, [b]ut they concede that the mood music of the event was at times strained. Brown handed over carefully selected gifts, including a pen holder made from the wood of a warship that helped stamp out the slave trade - a sister ship of the vessel from which timbers were taken to build Mr Obama's Oval Office desk. Mr Obama's gift in return, a collection of Hollywood film DVDs that could have been bought from any high street store, looked like the kind of thing the White House might hand out to the visiting head of a minor African state.

The real views of many in Obama administration were laid bare by a State Department official involved in planning the Brown visit, who reacted with fury when questioned by The Sunday Telegraph about why the event was so low-key. The official dismissed any notion of the special relationship, saying: "There's nothing special about Britain. You're just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn't expect special treatment."

As we round out Obama's first 50 days, let's look back on some of the highlights:
  • After their first two weeks in the White House, Barry and Michelle were already creaking under the pressure, and they left the White House on short notice to chill out with second-graders. Barry: "We were just tired of being in the White House."
  • Barry was quick to bounce back and soon developed a reputation as a party animal, throwing taxpayer money away for parties nearly every night with ‘friends’ and supporters, celebrating everything from the Superbowl and Valentine's weekend to President's Day and the Passage of the Porkulus bill.
  • Almost every time he spoke, Obama whined about the incredible mess he inherited. In turn, the Dow-Jones plummeted just about every time Obama opened his mouth.
  • Obama displayed incredible ignorance with regard to elementary economic issues, and sent incredibly confusing signals about the health of the economy. In one breath Obama would tell us not to "stuff money" in our matresses: “I don’t think that people should be fearful about our future, I don’t think that people should suddenly mistrust all of our financial institutions.” In the very next breath, he would tell us that the end is not in sight when it comes to the economic crisis.
  • Obama sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Russia, and in a stupid stunt worthy of Tracy Flick, Hillary embarrassed the whole world with a gift gaffe from Hades.
  • As the embarrassment of his incompetence became increasingly painful, Barry spent an inordinate amount of time trying to distract voters from the real issues by picking fights with a harmless radio talk show host.
Now we hear that poor Obama is shirking his responsibilities because he is tired. What a crybaby! What happened to the boundless energy of "Campaign Obama"...that studly young man who pranced around on the beaches of Hawaii to show us what a beefy hunk he is?

And what happened to the promise of repairing our reputation in the world? Is this what they had in mind? Insulting the British and playing silly games with the Russians? Are they kidding?? It's not funny. It's an outrage!

CNN glosses over the Administration's failures, telling us it's the thought that counts. I'd like to think Obama has more than good intentions up his sleeve — but he doesn't, does he? In a few years we will look back on Obama's first fifty days and think "those were the good times, before we had any idea how bad things would get."



More

Presidential Approval Index Dropping
Obama has a Presidential Approval Index rating of +6, his lowest rating to date.
.
Not a Socialist
For the record: Obama is NOT a socialist — or is he? Read the whole article...methinks he doth protest too much.

Obama is Pro-Life
George Soros Funds Catholic Groups Making Obama Seem Pro-Life on Abortion. Via Michelle Malkin.

Obama's unprecedented dependence on the teleprompter

Have you not heard enough lies from Hussein lately? This should satisfy your needs.

Jindal Blasts Budget, Answers Critics

Is Specter History?
Former Rep. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) will challenge Sen. Arlen Specter in a primary for the second straight cycle, according to Pennsylvania GOP sources. Toomey narrowly lost to Specter in a 2004 primary by less than 1 percent and recently said he was considering another run.

Jesus was a Palestinian?
A "true or false" question on the origins of Christianity asserted that "Christianity was started by a young Palestinian named Jesus." The teacher's edition says this is "true."

Today's Obama Economy May Be Worse Than Great Depression

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Obama vs. Jindal


Highlights from Obama's Speech

A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. 

Obama, this statement is insane.  You are either woefully ignorant or shamelessly dishonest.  We have never stopped transferring wealth from the wealthy and productive to the poor and unproductive. When bemoaning the injustice of cutting taxes in the face of budget surpluses, please understand that tax cuts do not "transfer" wealth to the wealthy.  Tax cuts reduce the transference of power to the powerful.  Obama wants to propagate the lie that wealth and opportunity are created by the government in Washington and then transferred to the people by benevolent politicians. This is a dangerous deception and we must not allow the Democrats to continue to get away with it!

I asked this Congress to send me a recovery plan by President's Day that would put people back to work and put money in their pockets. Not because I believe in bigger government — I don't... 

You don't believe in bigger government?  Seriously?  You're willing to tell a lie that big?

...Not because I'm not mindful of the massive debt we've inherited -- I am. 

What did you do to fight the accumulation of "massive debt" when you were in the Senate?  If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.

Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs. More than 90 percent of these jobs will be in the private sector. 

Sounds like you're making things up Hussein.

We have created a new website called recovery.gov so that every American can find out how and where their money is being spent. 

On Obama's recovery.gov you can find cryptic and misleading information such as: 
"Tax Relief - includes $15 B for Infrastructure and Science, $61 B for Protecting the Vulnerable, $25 B for Education and Training and $22 B for Energy, so total funds are $126 B for Infrastructure and Science, $142 B for Protecting the Vulnerable, $78 B for Education and Training, and $65 B for Energy."  

What?!  Infrastructure, science, education, training, energy = tax relief?  This is your transparency?    

My budget does not attempt to solve every problem or address every issue. It reflects the stark reality of what we've inherited -- a trillion-dollar deficit, a financial crisis, and a costly recession. 

Hussein, you're being disingenuous.  You did precious little to help the situation when you were in the Senate (you were too busy looking for your next job), and now, one month into your reign of terror, you've grown the deficit at an unprecedented rate.

Given these realities, everyone in this chamber -- Democrats and Republicans -- will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars. And that includes me. 

Oh really?  What will you and your democrat friends be sacrificing? Please share the details.

With the deficit we inherited, the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term challenges we must meet... 

There you go again!  You didn't inherit it if you helped to create it.

...it has never been more important to ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to bring this deficit down. 

Yeah, we get it.  You're so excited about raising taxes, you can hardly stand it.

Now, I'm proud that we passed a recovery plan free of earmarks.

The porkulus plan is earmark-free?  Well, that depends on what your definition of "is" is.

I will not allow terrorists to plot against the American people from safe havens halfway around the world. We will not allow it.

No, you won't simply allow it, you will make it easier for them to plot against us.

To relieve the strain on our forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and Marines. 

We will see how this plays out.  Let's not talk only about increased numbers, lets talk about increased strength.  And let's talk about missile defense.  Why are you opposed to missile defense systems?


Highlights from Jindal's Speech

The strength of America is not found in our government. It is found in the compassionate hearts and enterprising spirit of our citizens. 

Obama and his friends do not believe that Americas are compassionate, they believe that they need to save us from ourselves and from each other.

To solve our current problems, Washington must lead. But the way to lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of Washington politicians. The way to lead is by empowering you — the American people. Because we believe that Americans can do anything. 

Washington politicians are primarily interested in empowering themselves.

Who among us would ask our children for a loan, so we could spend money we do not have, on things we do not need? That is precisely what the Democrats in Congress just did.
Republicans need to repeat this line thousands of times.

Republicans want to work with President Obama. We appreciate his message of hope -- but sometimes it seems we look for hope in different places. Democratic leaders in Washington place their hope in the federal government. We place our hope in you -- the American people.

They place their hope in themselves.  Their lust for power is never satisfied.

A few weeks ago, the President warned that our nation is facing a crisis that he said 'we may not be able to reverse.'  Our troubles are real, to be sure. But don't let anyone tell you that we cannot recover -- or that America's best days are behind her. 


More


Food is the new sex.

Obama's Moral Majority
Conservatives, this is a must read!  Written by a lib, but we can turn the ideas around to use them for our own goals.

Saving America: Time to hit the streets?
Noting the tactics of left-wing organizations such as Code Pink, which like to send handfuls of noisy people to a lawmaker's office, DeMint suggests such things do get the attention of congressmen and senators.  "I think some of these folks might think twice if they had several hundred people standing outside one of their state offices asking, 'What in the world are you thinking?' "If that doesn't work, there's plenty of room on the boulevard.

The Little Red Hen Shrugs.

Strange Fish Has See-Through Head

Dogbert is now the unofficial mascott of RightKlik:

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Reactions to Jindal's Rebuttal



Reactions to Jindal's Rebuttal to Obama's Speech to Congress have been all over the spectrum. Here is a representative sample from the blogosphere:
  • Jindal is the real deal. It's the audacity of executive competence.
  • It's clear from historical examples...that Bobby Jindal is vastly more effective working without a set script. He knows the message, but he delivers it much better off the cuff.
  • Last night he looked nervous and testosterone-deficient.  He needs to hit the weights.
  • Regardless of what anyone thought of him last night, and I was pretty hard on him, you can't deny the effectiveness of the Today interview. The GOP should put him on every interview show they can find. 
  • Given all the goof ups and gaffes Obama has provided, Jindal shouldn't be worried.  First impressions?  How about showing the steady hand Jindal displayed when Louisiana was facing Hurricane Gustav.  That was leadership.
  • Four years from now, this won't even be a blip.
  • I remember Reagan looking woefully unprepared and completely out of his depth in his first debate against Walter Mondale. And we all know how that turned out.  If the GOP wants to turn this around, all of their image consultants and handlers for their various candidates should be taken out and...
  • As a loyal Obama supporter, is it too early for me to contribute some cash to this cat's presidential campaign? 

From Lorie Byrd:

Jindal has only just gotten started. He had a larger audience on Today for his follow up to last night's response. He and other Republicans have to continue to hammer the absurdity of Obama's policies and reckless spending, and provide reasonable, common sense alternatives.

Those Dems here who think Jindal is toast must not have watched the video. Today has a humongous audience. I wouldn't be surprised if more people did see the Today interview than saw the speech last night.

Here is why I am thrilled to see the Dems here write Jindal off...

1.  He will be underestimated now. That is always better than being overestimated. If I had not had such sky high expectations for Jindal last night I probably would have thought the speech was just fine.

2.  Jindal is brilliant off the cuff. You know, in the real world, without a script. His mastery of the facts is incredible. Obama is a brilliant teleprompter speaker. Take away his teleprompter and he uh, uh, has uh, a little, uh, trouble.

3.  If Jindal continues to do interviews like the one he did today on Today he will be a superstar by the time 2012 rolls around. That Dems don't get that only helps us. That Dems don't understand how devastating it is for Jindal to point out that Dems didn't even read the bill and still don't know what is in it, only helps Republicans.

4.  Jindal showed last night a weakness in reading from a teleprompter into a camera. If you read the speech he gave last night, the content is good. Had he given a smooth polished speech full of fluff (Hope'n Change) that would have done more damage because it would have been at odds with his image as someone with a bright, quick mind who can get things done in his state.  


My take:

Obama supporters can heave a big sigh of relief—Jindal has a weakness: in front of a teleprompter, he gives a lackluster performance. But Democrats know Jindal is a force to be reckoned with. Jindal's conservative vision and intellect are razor sharp. He needs to work on his teleprompter skills, but he can beat Obama. I'd love to see those two square off in a debate. Jindal would clean Obama's clock.


More


The Jindal Phenomenon
Jindal, while also religious and conservative, speaks the language of the knowledge class and will not be easily caricatured or dismissed. To journalists, policy experts and Rhodes scholars, Jindal is also "one of us."  At this point in the election cycle, no Republican can be considered more than the flavor of the month. But this is an appealing one.

The Real Bobby Jindal
The GOP should put him on every interview show they can find. 

Jindal, Take 2
Bobby Jindal bounced back this morning from a generally-panned performance to an energetic performance on Today. He gives Meredith Viera a slew of specifics, arguing with more intensity about the pitfalls of Porkulus.

Governor Bobby Jindal On The Today Show


Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Jindal's Rebuttal to Obama's Speech Before Congress




Excerpts:

"As I grew up, my mom and dad taught me the values that attracted them to this country - and they instilled in me an immigrant's wonder at the greatness of America. As a child, I remember going to the grocery store with my dad. Growing up in India, he had seen extreme poverty. And as we walked through the aisles, looking at the endless variety on the shelves, he would tell me: 'Bobby, Americans can do anything.' I still believe that to this day.  

...

"Republicans are ready to work with the new President to provide those solutions. Here in my state of Louisiana, we don't care what party you belong to if you have good ideas to make life better for our people. We need more of that attitude from both Democrats and Republicans in our nation's capital. All of us want our economy to recover and our nation to prosper. So where we agree, Republicans must be the President's strongest partners. And where we disagree, Republicans have a responsibility to be candid and offer better ideas for a path forward.

...

"The strength of America is not found in our government. It is found in the compassionate hearts and enterprising spirit of our citizens.

...

"To solve our current problems, Washington must lead. But the way to lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of Washington politicians. The way to lead is by empowering you - the American people. Because we believe that Americans can do anything.

...

"Democratic leaders say their legislation will grow the economy. What it will do is grow the government, increase our taxes down the line, and saddle future generations with debt. Who among us would ask our children for a loan, so we could spend money we do not have, on things we do not need? That is precisely what the Democrats in Congress just did. It's irresponsible. And it's no way to strengthen our economy, create jobs, or build a prosperous future for our children.

...

"In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear - because our party got away from its principles. You elected Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost your trust - and rightly so.

...

"A few weeks ago, the President warned that our nation is facing a crisis that he said 'we may not be able to reverse.' Our troubles are real, to be sure. But don't let anyone tell you that we cannot recover - or that America's best days are behind her."

Full text of Jindal's Speech