Showing posts with label Redistribution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Redistribution. Show all posts

Monday, July 30, 2012

Preaching the Gospel of Redistribution


Behold Michelle Obama’s $6800 jacket! Please note that $6,800 is enough money to feed 40,000 hungry children.

Here's a comment from the Obama fan club:
she has the money to buy nice things, why shouldn’t she? she’s married to the president of the united states of america. what does her having an expensive jacket have to do with starving children? is her buying that jacket taking food out of peoples mouthes? no, it isn’t. what, is she supposed to deny the things she wants because somewhere people are starving? i all of the stars she supposed to single handedly feed all of the starving children?

no, she isn’t, it’s not her responsibility.
This is a remarkably laissez-faire statement to have come from an Obama apologist.

Newsflash: The Obamas and their allies aren't libertarians.

Awkwardly alluding to Genesis, the first book of the Bible, Barack Obama has said that we should be “Living by the principle that we are our brother's keeper, caring for the poor and those in need.”

But Obama’s biological brother lives in Kenya on $12 a year

Obama also said, “I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

Just to be clear, Obama is not talking about voluntary charitable redistribution.

But as they spread their insidious Gospel of Coercive Redistribution, the Obamas pile the riches of our capitalist society upon themselves.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

What has your government done for you lately?

Posted by Lilac Sunday; from Lilac Sunday: Red Girl in a Blue State


Answer: They've made the interest rates on your credit cards go up.

Up until recently, banks could tailor the cost of credit to the risk of default by raising or lowering interest rates on customers based on the customers' credit-worthiness and financial condition, and assessing steep penalties on customers who breach their agreements by paying late or not paying at all. And why shouldn't they be able to? Credit cards are collateral-free lines of credit, tremendously valuable to the customer and potentially very risky to the bank; in order to ease access to credit on the front end, and allow people to obtain cards without the time commitment and document production required for other loan products such as, say, mortgages, banks made the entry barriers low and then slammed you when you broke the agreement. And that's the way it should be. The greatest possible number of customers benefit from easy access to credit, and the greatest possible share of the systemic costs of customer default are borne by the defaulting customers themselves.

At least that's the way it used to work. Last year, in response to scattered customer complaints and a general desire to impose communitarian versions of "fairness" on the financial sector, Congress passed the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (Card Act), which reduces banks' ability to accurately price risk and penalize default. As a result, banks have less flexibility to raise interest rates on customers once they've opened a credit card account, and less ability to impose meaningful penalties on customers who default.

What happens when banks can't recover the cost of default from the defaulting customers? Bingo, they recover the cost from all customers, including those who use credit wisely and comply with the terms of their agreements. Banks started raising their credit card interest rates before the Card Act's interest rate provisions took effect in February, they've been quicker to reduce credit lines, and access to credit is becoming more difficult. Card Act provisions limiting the imposition of penalties took effect this past Sunday, so the tightening of consumer credit is only going to accelerate.

The Card Act's sponsor, Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), remarked: "Better that consumers should know up-front what the interest rate is, even if it is higher, than to be soaked on the back end by tricks and hidden fees." In other words, let's spread the wealth around; people who read agreements before entering into them, and who keep their financial bargains, are going to bear the financial burdens of people who default. Because in the Left's twisted version of fairness, making everyone suffer equally is only fair.

I've never been "soaked on the back end by tricks and hidden fees" by a credit card company; I'm not lucky, I read and save the disclosures. But thanks to Carolyn Maloney, American financial illiteracy has been codified by an act of Congress, which has eliminated what used to be a very strong motivation to understand and remember the terms of any financial agreement we freely enter into.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Tough Love from Ben Franklin


Benjamin Franklin on "spreading the wealth" around...

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.

After hundreds of years of failed redistribution, the nuts on the left still don't understand these simple concepts.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

The Lost Lesson of Thanksgiving

Have a Happy Thanksgiving...and take a moment to review the most important lesson of the first Thanksgiving in 1623:



More


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Hear That Giant Sucking Sound?

H.R. 2454’s Transfer of U.S. Wealth to Foreign Nations

Based on EIA and EPA data. Dollars in millions. Approximate cost to customers in 2012

Hear that giant sucking sound? That's the sound of Obama's Energy Tax. Cap & Trade will suck the money from your pockets so your dollars can go to people who deserve your money more than you do.

Thanks America, for voting Democrat!


More


Climate Bill Will Lead to Transfer of Wealth and Power to Foreign Nations.

Libertarians remind Obama of his "firm pledge" not to tax health care benefits.

Why does WalMart support ObamaCare?

Only 10% of Massachusetts voters say the quality of health care has gotten better as a result of their reform plan.

Blue on Blue: Helen Thomas hammers Gibbs on Obama’s phony town hall.

Obama Missile Defense Plan Puts America at Risk.

Atlanta Tea Party Back On for July 4, this time at the Georgia State Capitol.

A bright young Republican we can get excited about? Ryan Frazier is running for Senate. Here are some videos featuring the style & the substance.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Gas Prices At Five Year Lows, Obama Hasn't Even Invaded Canada Yet


The price of gasoline is as low as it has been in five years. How did this happen? Was it the result of a socialist redistribution scheme, tax credits, or some kind of bailout? Was it because we punished corporate executives at the oil companies? Did we finally get those speculators under control? Did the federal goverment develop a new kind of energy-saving technology?  Did we threaten to go to war with the Canadians unless they increased oil production? Was it something Obama did?

No, gasoline prices did not decrease because of government intervention.  Prices went too high, demand went down, prices dropped. Economics 101.

The invisible hand of supply and demand works very well. But on the downside, when we let free markets solve our problems, politicians don't get credit and the news media don't get to write scintillating headlines demonizing corporate executives.  



More

A Saudi court has rejected a plea to divorce an
eight-year-old girl married off by her father to a man who is 58, saying the case should wait until the girl reaches puberty...  Please remind me why we care what this part of the world thinks about us?

Obama and a new Congress can’t forget about
energy policy.

Obama worshipers: don't expect things to change overnight. Rice says Obama likely to follow Bush on foreign policy. Ms Rice’s words could damp expectations that the incoming administration will represent a complete break with its predecessor on foreign policy.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Obama Should Redistribute His Own Wealth First


I have no doubt that there are many people who sincerely believe that "spreading the wealth around" promotes the common good and that redistribution somehow makes for a more fair, just and equitable world.  Obama is one of these people.  He has famously stated "...I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody." 

Some say that if Obama believes in redistribution, he should be helping his impoverished brother in Kenya, or his poor aunt in Boston.  Maybe.  But maybe Obama has already tried to help his family.  Maybe Obama's family is too proud and independent to accept help.  You and I don't know the situation, so let's give Obama the benefit of the doubt.  And private charity isn't really the issue here.  Obama is not promoting private charity...or at least that's not the thrust of his campaign message. Obama said he wants to improve the world through "redistributive change," and he plans increase taxes and fatten up the U.S. Treasury to make it happen.

So I said, fine Obama, if you can convince a majority of the voters to sign up for these risky schemes, go for it!  But then things got more interesting.  McCain said, "Nobody likes taxes. Let's not raise anybody's taxes."
"Well, I don't mind paying a little more," Obama responded.

WAIT A MINUTE!  He said what?

"...I don't mind paying a little more."

*Wow*

Hey Obama! There's good news.  If you really want to pay more, YOU CAN DO IT RIGHT NOW.  The United States Treasury will accept your donation.  This is no joke.  If you need to know more, click here.

Obama, this is your chance to lead by example.  Make a big deal about it, have a big fancy check-signing photo-op surrounded by smiling celebrities and politicians; heck, you could even invite that Obama Girl.  You could show us how much you hate those nasty Bush tax cuts and send an amount equal to what you saved because of those cuts.  With the millions you made from your book, I'm sure it would be a lot of money.  And while you're at it, you could ask your supporters to send money to the U.S. Treasury instead of sending it to you for your campaign.  Haven't you already gotten $600,000,000?  Time to start redistributing!

Obama, put your money where your mouth is and make a financial donation to the U.S. Treasury today!  You do believe in the things you say, don't you?

*Final Note: Obama is ahead in the polls.  Sitting out the election is a vote for Obama.  You don't even have to get out of your chair to help Obama win!