Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts

Monday, July 9, 2012

Feel-Good Headline of the Day: Conservative Extremists are Extremely Happy


Conservatives are happier than liberals, and conservative extremists are the happiest people of all:
...conservative Republicans were 68 percent more likely than liberal Democrats to say they were “very happy” about their lives. This pattern has persisted for decades.

....the happiest Americans are those who say they are either “extremely conservative” (48 percent very happy) or “extremely liberal” (35 percent). Everyone else is less happy, with the nadir at dead-center “moderate” (26 percent).

...Whatever the explanation, the implications are striking. The Occupy Wall Street protesters may have looked like a miserable mess. In truth, they were probably happier than the moderates making fun of them from the offices above. And none, it seems, are happier than the Tea Partiers, many of whom cling to guns and faith with great tenacity. Which some moderately liberal readers of this newspaper might find quite depressing.
Emphasis added.

Read the rest. Liberals aren't going to be happy with the explanation.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

GOP Majority Leader Working With Dems to Defeat Conservatives

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) is recruiting Democrats to help him defeat a conservative running for the U.S. Senate from Indiana:
The Young Guns Network, a group affiliated with House Republican majority leader Eric Cantor, is encouraging Democrats in Indiana to vote in the May 8 GOP primary for incumbent senator Dick Lugar. Politico's Maggie Haberman first reported that the YG Network has been sending mailers to Indiana voters reminding Democrats and independents that they can register to vote in the open primary and encouraging those folks to vote for Lugar and against his conservative challenger, Richard Mourdock...

...the rest of the mailing criticizes Mourdock's conservative views on eliminating federal education spending and says the choice is "between extreme cuts and mainstream Indiana leadership"
The GOP's new "big tent" philosophy: Big enough to include borrow-and-waste Dems, small enough to keep conservatives out.

Contact Eric Cantor and his "Young Guns Network" via email and on Facebook and Twitter:

Facebook: YG Action Fund
Twitter: @EricCantor
Twitter: @GOPLeader

More:

  • $100,000 could go a long way to supporting a Republican against a Democrat this year in a competitive House race. Is helping a six-term Senate incumbent who's not so conservative try to beat back a conservative primary challenge by someone who would hold the Senate seat for the GOP really the best use of that money?

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Conservatives Are Their Enemies: Example #104,628


The Republican "Young Guns" of the U.S. House of Representatives are spending beaucoup bucks to help an octogenarian Senate RINO fight a losing battle against a conservative challenger:
"Young Guns ... was designed to help leaders like Eric Cantor and Kevin McCarthy chart a new course for the center-right movement and the House majority,” Young Guns Action Fund super PAC founder John Murray has said. It's not clear how this donation to Lugar furthers that cause. And it's not clear why Young Guns is meddling in a GOP Senate primary. Indeed, Mike Pence, another young gun-type House member who's now running for Indiana governor, has conspicuously failed to endorse Lugar for reelection.

More important: $100,000 could go a long way to supporting a Republican against a Democrat this year in a competitive House race. Is helping a six-term Senate incumbent who's not so conservative try to beat back a conservative primary challenge by someone who would hold the Senate seat for the GOP really the best use of that money?
This would be hard to understand if you didn't know that Republicans hate conservatives.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

The Tea Party is Not Dead


TEA! Temecula

X-Posted from the Left Coast Rebel

According to Politico, Republican party power-mongers seems to think that the Tea Party is dead.

I think the death of the Tea Party is highly exaggerated.

Many are tired and dispirited. Most Tea Partiers have simply moved into underground Sons of Liberty liberty watch-guards.

Instead of orchestrating historic national protests, they are in one way or another changing the nation from within the political system.

One can argue that the system is so beyond hope and repair that it cannot even be saved at this point.

But, like it or not, that's the now-somewhat underground position the Tea Party has naturally transitioned into.

From Politico....

Bad:
GOP elders sympathize with the movement’s ideas and want to channel whatever energy the decentralized groups offer for November. But when asked about the tea-party’s influence in interviews here, the movement was always spoken of in the third person and as one constituency in the larger Republican coalition, sort of like defense hawks or fiscal conservatives. Many Republicans here said that tea-party activists now understand that things will run more smoothly if those with experience are in charge rather than those who put a premium on ideology over process.“The important thing for any group in the party to understand…is that you need experience to govern,” said New Hampshire Republican Chairman Wayne MacDonald. “Everybody has to start somewhere. It’s just important they learn the mechanics of how the party operates…It doesn’t mean new ideas aren’t welcome.”
(SNIP)
The tea party movement’s influence has waned everywhere since its apex in 2010. Most visibly, the Republican Party is poised to nominate the most pragmatic of the men who ran for president this cycle even though many tea-party groups vocally opposed him during the primary. Indeed, Mitt Romney received a coronation of sorts at a unity lunch here Friday, soaking up standing ovations and basking in blessings from 2008 rival Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).
Good:
In fact, libertarian supporters of Ron Paul made more successful inroads into the party organization in 2012. A.J. Spiker, the vice chairman of Ron Paul’s Iowa campaign, became state party chairman in February. James Smack, a vocal 2008 Paul supporter Nevada, got elevated from vice chair to acting state chair in February after Amy Tarkanian resigned to help her husband run for Congress. Now he’s challenging former Nevada Gov. Bob List for Nevada’s committeeman slot at next month’s state convention. Morton Blackwell, the longtime national committeeman representing Virginia, believes it’s only a matter of time before tea-party activists end up in the highest echelons of the party. But when they do, he doesn’t think they’ll be thought of as tea partiers.
Exit question: If the Tea Party is dead -- as many power-broking GOP honchos insist -- then why, as of yesterday, is progressive-statist three-decade-serving Utah Senator Orrin Hatch fighting for his political life?

Hmm?

Updated: The Tea Party is dead! Or is it?

Check out former Commmunist sympathizer David "comb-over" Axelrod's ridiculous statement today on the Tea Party's congressional "reign of terror." That's some pretty violent imagery from the White House Occupier's chief campaign adviser, no?

Added (by RightKlik): While we all know that the Tea Party is practically dead, we also know that the Tea Party is actively destroying the GOP (and the entire country) with its radical extremism. It works both ways like that.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Barack Obama is a One-Term President

I first heard this on Hannity. If you haven't seen it, I guarantee you'll love it. If you've already seen or heard it, I think you owe it to yourself to play it again:


If given the opportunity, I'd vote for Cheney early and often!


More


Video: Rubio rocks CPAC

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Christmas Wishes


Tomorrow, a warm and fuzzy Christmas post. Today, Christmas wishes:

Tony Blankley: "We live in hope this Christmas season that we may yet claw back our government in time to protect our grandchildren's freedom and prosperity."

Michelle Malkin: "My Christmas wish for 2010: A new generation of conservative leaders who will walk the 'fight ‘em to the finish line' talk — fighting to win, not fighting to settle."

Erick Erickson: "All I want from you guys for Christmas is simple, pick one of the following and make a $25.00 contribution."

RightKlik: Send this guy to the US Senate to replace Ted Kennedy


More


Obamacare Slaps $15,000 Annual Fee on Middle Class Families

For Sale: One senator. No principles, low price

Now They Tell Us: CBO "Double Counted" Medicare Savings. Accounting gimmicks can hide it no longer: ObamaCare will grow deficit

Awesome Christmas Prank


Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Hoffman's Brave Fight


Doug Hoffman, the Conservative Party outsider, annihilated the liberal Republicandespite the fact that the RINO was propped up with huge quantities of GOP cash. Then, after the turncoat Republican dropped out, Hoffman delivered a strong showing against the Blue Dog Democrat, who enjoyed the full support of the White House.

Amid reports of broken voting machines and other irregularities, we'll have to wait a while for the final percentages, but Hoffman has conceded to the Democrat, Bill Owens.

What does Doug Hoffman's performance in New York's 23rd Congressional District mean?

The Democrat-run media won't admit it now, but when Hoffman was a long shot, they pointed out how Hoffman's campaign success would be a reflection on the power of the Tea Party Movement and the persuasiveness of the classic conservative message.

They were right.

Hoffman's surprisingly strong performance presents some important lessons for both parties.

As much as they might want to drift (or lurch) to the left, establishment elites don't have that luxury. In a nation in which conservatives outnumber liberals 2:1, the Democrats and the Republicans are going to move to the right. If they don't move to the right voluntarily, conservative Tea Party activists will drag them to the right.

The American taxpayers are fed up. We don't need or want more government interference in our lives.

Conservatives are standing up in opposition to the failed, tired ideas of the '60s and '70s. We're saying no to another decade of stagflation, more societal decay and further breakdown of the American family.

To the GOP, conservatives are saying, "We've compromised enough ALREADY!" We don't need more Arlen Specters or Olympia Snowes.

We won't put up with Republicans whose disdain for time-tested conservative values is only slightly less offensive than that of the radical Democrats.

We won't don't need a party whose assaults on the financial security of future generations are only slightly less reckless that that of the Kleptocrats.

And we won't settle for politicians whose attacks on liberty are only slightly less intense than those of the Party of Pelosi.

Conservatives know they need the GOP, and the GOP is surely beginning to understand how much it needs conservatives. So there can be no more million-dollar campaigns for ACORN-backed, tax-and-spend, secret-ballot-bashing turncoat RINOs who are to the left of Obama on social issues.

Liberty is the only alternative to tyranny, and conservatives will always fight for liberty. That fact needs to sink in with the GOP...pronto.

Discussion: Memeorandum


More


MUST READ NOW: The GOP elite’s $1 million object lesson — and the message of NY-23


Wild race: Doug Hoffman spoiled by the Republican


Doctor Zero: The Stupid Party

NY-23 race first test of tea party power

Can we say goodbye to the tax-and-spend-and-earmark philosophy that has decimated the Republican party in Congress?

Patrick Ruffini
Obama: 2 visits to VA, 3 visits to NJ. Too bad he couldn't make it to NY-23.

Bookmark and Share

Conservative Power


Conservative Doug Hoffman has shaken up the Republican National Committee. Just a few days ago, Republicans were still investing hundreds of thousands of dollars on a tax-and-spend, pro-stimulus, socially liberal DIABLO* candidate who wants to eliminate workers' right to vote by secret ballot. Then their candidate dropped out of the race and endorsed the Democrat. Now the GOP is running this beautiful ad:

The eyes of the nation are on the North Country. What we decide on Tuesday, will echo from Albany to Washington.

Who's side are you on? The Pelosi-Patterson tax-and-spend trainwreck? Or do you believe in Republican, Conservative values? ...Like thrift, personal responsibility, and family.

Let's tell the liberals enough is enough. No more bailouts, taxes and budget-busting spending. It's time to create jobs. With proven conservative ideas like lower taxes.

Let your voice be heard. Join the movement to bring real, conservative change. Tell the politicians NO MORE. We won't let you bankrupt America. We need conservative leaders who stand up for our values. Fight back. Vote CONSERVATIVE. It matters like never before.

How quickly things change. Welcome to the Tea Party era.


*DIABLO = Democrat In All But Label Only

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, October 18, 2009

My First Political Contribution

As the first anniversary of this blog approaches (October 26), I've been thinking quite a bit about my plans for the future.

This time last year, as Obama's inevitable victory was unfolding, I realized that I could no longer sit on the sidelines, just watching the news and worrying about the future. So I joined the blogosphere.

Blogging helped me to make some important connections, and through those connections I have become more involved in the political process. This year, for the first time in my life, I have been emailing Congress, writing the President, attending political protest rallies and tweeting anyone who will listen.

All these things have been helpful, but they're still not enough. Congress and Obama aren't listening. We have to keep shouting, but we have to do more. We have to make a financial investment.

If you're like me (and 98% of everyone else in the country), you live in a district that is safe for the incumbent. In my case, that's fine. But wherever we live, we have an obligation to assist our conservative friends who are struggling to tip the scales in hotly contested races in other areas of the country. They need our help and welcome our involvement. So please join me in support of candidates who stand firmly on conservative principles, wherever they happen to live.

Here's a great place to start: a conservative candidate in New York needs our help. Doug Hoffman is fighting a liberal Republican and a moderate Democrat to represent New York's 23rd Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives (an open seat). I live over 1,100 miles from his neck of the woods, but today, I sent Hoffman a small contribution.

This race is critically important because Hoffman's conservative New York district has been abandoned by out-of-touch GOP elites who have been dumping truckloads of money on the liberal Republican candidate.

Tea party activists have risen to the occasion and are fighting for Doug Hoffman, a candidate whose values are in sync with the district.

Hoffman jumped into the race to fill the conservative void after he was passed over by the local Republican power brokers. He joined the Conservative Party, which is well established and influential in New York. Hoffman is a no-frills candidate, but he's strong and he's surging in the polls.

As the only congressional election this fall, this race will have special significance as a political barometer. Hoffman's win would send an important message to the GOP establishment: "Conservatives are in control now, 2010 belongs to us."


More:



Help conservatives in district NY23 to promote the candidate who reflects their values. Donate Today!

Robert Stacy McCain is ALL OVER this story. Follow his blog for important updates.

EXCLUSIVE PROFILE: Conservative Doug Hoffman: 'Citizen Who's Had Enough'

Michelle Malkin: A message from NY-23 conservative candidate Doug Hoffman

Doug Hoffman on the issues.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Liberals admit conservatives have upper hand on Twitter


Conservatives are winning an important battle.


"...[W]e are being out-organized on Twitter," said Gina Cooper, a blogger who helped organize Netroots Nation, an annual gathering of online liberal activists that met last week in Pittsburgh. "There is some catching up to do on the progressive side."

Tracy Viselli, who attended Netroots Nation, agreed with Cooper and admitted that liberal bloggers are ceding this valuable territory to conservatives.

"Conservatives are very tightly knit and getting their message out very well."

Are conservatives winning the message war because of the power of their "opposition energy", or have they simply congregated at the right place at the right time? If you're not already on Twitter, come and find out for yourself.

See you on Twitter.


More



The Five “I’s” To Twitter Success

Top Conservatives on Twitter
A rallying point for conservatives on Twitter.

Great Twitter resource for Conservatives:
#tcot links...Tracking what conservative twitter users are discussing.

TCOT Report
Breaking News From the Conservative World

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

The Ugly Truth

The road to government-run health care begins with deception. Here's the evidence:



More evidence via Rush Limbaugh

George Will yesterday on This Week with George Stephanopoulos had some profound insights and statistics during the roundtable discussion. He said, in the president's words, it'll keep 'em honest. The public option will keep 'em honest. "To try to preserve the government as a lagoon of honesty, you can argue, refuted by anybody who reads any budget of any administration."

So the Obama administration says the public option will keep the private sector honest. It's the public sector that's dishonest. It's the public sector that's corrupted. Number two. George Will says this. "Obama says it will play by the same rules as the private insurers, and therefore, won’t drive them out of business." Now, if you play by the same rules, what's the point? If you're going to have a public option that plays by the same rules as the private sector, then what's the point of having a public option? In real terms, there is no reason for it. If what you're saying is it's not going to be any better -- and we all know it can't be -- then why do it? "Third, it’s necessary to give what Secretary Sebelius said a choice to the consumers. There are 1,300 entities offering healthcare plans in this country. Another one--" i.e., the government "-- isn't going to change that."

Thirteen hundred entities offering health care plans in the country today and Sebelius says that Obama needs to have a public option to give consumers a choice. They've got choices out the wazoo. "Taking this a step further, many of these 1,300 entities will likely cease to exist if government gets involved." So the end result is that there will be far fewer options for people. The idea is to wipe out the private sector with the public option, that's its intent. George Will again: "Finally, there’s the argument that the American people are not smart enough to handle something as complicated as healthcare and have a competitive market. They’ve done rather well in computers." But you see, this gets to the common thing I continually attempt to remind everybody of, and that is the government liberals, Democrats look at everybody with contempt. None of us are smart enough to survive without them paving the road, guiding the way, and steering us.

George Will was not done, though. He is talking to Donna Brazile. He said, "You talk about the 46, 47 million uninsured. Fourteen million of them are already eligible for other government programs and haven’t signed up. Ten million are in households with household incomes of $75,000 a year and could afford it if they wanted to. Furthermore, an enormous number in that 47 million are not American citizens. Sixty percent of the uninsured in San Francisco are not citizens." So this 47 million uninsured number that the left and the media is always throwing around is disingenuous, it's largely irrelevant. They portray this number and it's grown from 42 to 43 million during the Clinton days, now it's magically up to 47 million and is just as accurate as their homeless number was inaccurate. So of the 47 million, they try to paint this picture that the system is so unfair and so mean that it's leaving 47 million Americans out, and it is not doing so.

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 29, 2009

To Disgust A Liberal


As I've noted in other blog posts, morality has an enormous impact on political considerations. Along these lines come some very interesting observations from the New York Times:

"If you want to tell whether someone is conservative or liberal, what are a couple of completely nonpolitical questions that will give a good clue?

"How’s this: Would you be willing to slap your father in the face, with his permission, as part of a comedy skit?

"And, second: Does it disgust you to touch the faucet in a public restroom?

"Studies suggest that conservatives are more often distressed by actions that seem disrespectful of authority, such as slapping Dad. Liberals don’t worry as long as Dad has given permission.

"Likewise, conservatives are more likely than liberals to sense contamination or perceive disgust. People who would be disgusted to find that they had accidentally sipped from an acquaintance’s drink are more likely to identify as conservatives."

"One of the main divides between left and right is the dependence on different moral values. For liberals, morality derives mostly from fairness and prevention of harm." For conservatives, morality is much more — it also involves loyalty, upholding authority and striving for purity. (Purity is related to the part of the moral mind that fuels our revulsion at disgust and makes us see carnality as degrading.)

"Liberals and conservatives don’t just think differently, they also feel differently. This may even be a result, in part, of divergent neural responses." Because of differences in the function of the medial prefrontal cortex of the brain, liberals sometimes have a blunted response to situations and objects that should elicit strong feelings of disgust.

Psychologists believe that disgust is "a protective mechanism against health risks such as feces, spoiled food or corpses." Societies apply the same emotion to social threats. "Humans appear to be the only species that registers disgust, which is why a dog will wag its tail in puzzlement when its horrified owner yanks it back from eating excrement."

"Psychologists have developed a 'disgust scale' based on how queasy people would be in 27 situations, such as stepping barefoot on an earthworm or smelling urine in a tunnel. Conservatives systematically register more disgust than liberals."

I would tend to conclude that conservatives should be thankful for their sophisticated medial prefrontal cortex and proud of their uniquely human and highly developed disgust mechanism. But of course the NY Times concludes that because of these disgust-related hangups, conservatives minds are superstitious, close-minded and dishonest. (They also note that Obama is brilliant — because he has all this figured out and has transcended the tribal morality of yesteryear.)

Whatever.

Snobby conclusions aside, I think there are some important lessons we can learn here.

Leftists cannot be expected to respond to the morally sophisticated arguments that conservatives try to present. And even if they understand the intellectual component of our arguments, they won't necessarily react with the same emotional depth that we would expect from fellow conservatives.

So let's be patient, and let's recognize that liberals and moderates need an education that they can understand and appreciate.


Update, from adagioforstrings:
Psychologists believe that disgust is "a protective mechanism against health risks such as feces, spoiled food or corpses." Aha! So that's why so many dead people vote Democratic!



More


Would You Slap Your Father? If So, You’re a Liberal

Snotty liberal puts an interesting spin on the moral roots of liberals and conservatives. [Video]

Has the Obama administration found a clever fail-proof strategy to stifle America’s Tea Parties?

Couple Ordered to Stop Holding Bible Study at Home Without Permit

Biden Jokes About Breaking Obama's Teleprompter

What do you find disgusting? Explore the disgust scale. My results:

My scores are shown in green, compared to the average of all other people (in purple) who have taken the scale.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Questions for My Liberal Friends

Are there any intelligent, rational liberals in the world? If so, I'd like to ask a few questions:
  • Liberals asked Americans to hand the keys of government over to the Democrats in order to end the "Culture of Corruption." In light of the recent antics of Rod Blagojevich, William "Cold Cash" Jefferson, Charlie Rangel and other luminaries, what are liberals saying about the culture of corruption now?
  • Liberals do not seem to be bothered by Obama's associations with the likes of Tony Rezko, Rod Bagojevich, William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, and Rhashid Khalidi.  Why not?
  • What do you think about gun control in India as it relates to recent events in Mumbai?
  • As part of their strategy to deal with international Islamist terrorism, liberals want to address the grievances of the terrorists.  Are you familiar with the concept of operant conditioning?
  • Most Americans (70% of Republicans, 62% of independents and 55% of Democrats) oppose the auto industry bailout plan, yet Democrats in Congress are poised to pass a bailout bill anyway. Why?
  • How high will the price of energy have to go before you are willing to support drilling in ANWR or expanding the use of nuclear energy and coal?
  • What kind of economy would be best for America?  
                A.  Socialist.
                B.  Communist.
                C.  Fascist.
                D.  Capitalist.
  • Obama has stated that he is in favor of tax increases (for reasons of "fairness") even when they result in DECREASES in revenue for the government.  Do you support Obama's thinking on this issue?  What do you know about the Laffer Curve?
  • Do you still believe that Obama will increase the tax burden only for individuals making $250,000  or more per year?  Are you going to hold him to that promise?
  • Liberals support progressive taxation for redistribution of wealth.  With which other Marxist principles do you agree? With which Marxist principles do you disagree?
  • Obama has outlined a intentionally vague health care agenda.  His health care czar, Tom Daschle wants to push a bare-bones health care bill through congress as soon as possible after Obama is elected.  A Federal Health Board would be charged with establishing the system's framework and filling in most of the details. This independent board would be insulated from political pressure.  Does this in any way strike you as undemocratic?
  • Liberals have consistently opposed voter identification laws aimed at reducing voter fraud.  Why?
  • Many Americans (particularly minorities) say that their children are trapped in failing schools.  Nationwide, 52 percent of parents, and 59 percent of public school parents, support school choice.  87 percent of black parents aged 26-35 and 66.4 percent of blacks aged 18-25 support vouchers.  Liberals consistently oppose school choice.  Why?
  • Obama was asked, "At what point does a baby get human rights?" His response: "...answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade." Based on his leadership in opposition to the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act, Obama has demonstrated that he believes that a baby gets human rights at an unspecified time AFTER he or she is born.  My question to liberals: is infanticide acceptable?
  • Is there anything Obama could do to lose your support?  If so, what?

More

Funny Video: Comedians vs. Blago 

1st Vietnamese-American elected to US Congress.

Voters Oust Indicted Congressman in Louisiana.


Barack Obama campaign raised nearly $1 billion, shattering records.

Barack Obama plans to reach out to Muslim world.

Is school choice popular?

Six in 10 oppose auto bailout, poll shows.