Showing posts with label Joe Miller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Miller. Show all posts

Monday, October 18, 2010

Left Wing Nut Job Detained at Miller Event; Progs Feign Apoplexy

Cross-posted at Left Coast Rebel

Tony Hopfinger, an irrational, out-of-control Left-Wing blogger-activist, was detained by security detail at a Joe Miller town hall meeting. Tony admits he started a shoving match with Miller security.

Left-wingers are clearly jubilant at the opportunity to ignore most of the facts and to pretend to be shocked:

Elizabeth Kennen: "Joe Miller displays his conservative principles - Liberty! Freedom! You're arrested for asking questions!"

Ian Richetti‎: "Joe Miller really doesn't comprehend that whole 'Freedom of the Press' thing. Liberty indeed."

koulflo: "joe miller, rand paul, christine o'donnell, sheryl angle, carl palladino, ron johnson. pretty much all haters."

Dan Riehl provides some essential background info on Tony and his blog, The Alaska Dispatch:
The Alaska Dispatch is not much more than the equivalent of a Lefty blog playing pretend journalists. They embarassed themselves when they came at me over the Murkowski cocaine allegations and appear to have a vested interest in trying to hurt Joe Miller's campaign for the Senate. At one point, this Tony Hopfinger was a HuffPo contributer, so it should be no surprise that they're covering Hopfinger's unhinged nonsense, too. You can Google him to see his many links to progressivism.
Thomas Lamb has more:
Yesterday afternoon I attended the Joe Miller Town Hall and it was a good event until it ended. When I attend these events, although I support Miller, I will hold a critical eye.

I will also stay in the back to observe the audience to see their reaction and I will also watch how the press act...

Here is what actually happened - Hopfinger was aggressive in his pursuit - Miller's security was trying to keep Hopfinger from Miller's path and at a distance so Miller could leave. As Miller's security tried to push Hopfinger out of Miller's path and keep him at a distance, Hopfinger kept pushing in on Miller.

Miller then reversed course and as he did, Tony began to follow Miller - two men in Miller's security detail stayed back and the scuffle between Hopfinger and the security detail began as a shoving match.

At that point Miller was gone from the scene....

There comes a point to where a person passes the point of getting answers to then becoming a person who is harassing an individual. And Tony Hopfinger crossed the line when it was clear Miller changed his direction because of Hopfinger engaging Miller's security detail in what started off as a shoving match.

What I also found interesting was the set-up that took place between blogger Jesse Griffin - who when leaving was asking where Tony was. Notably - Griffin was with the individual who asked the question on why Miller was a Welfare Queen.

And leave it to political hacks like Andrew Halcro to say Miller ordered the arrest - when Miller wasn't even there when the security team detained Hopfinger.
Read the rest of Lamb's eyewitness account here.

Statement from the Miller campaign:
While I've gotten used to the blog Alaska Dispatch's assault on me, I never thought it would lead to a physical assault. It's too bad that this blogger would take advantage of a "town hall" meeting to create a publicity stunt just two weeks before the election.

The Miller campaign was required by the facility to provide security at the event. Even though Joe had spent more than 40 minutes answering questions from those in attendance, the blogger chased Miller to the exit after the event concluded in an attempt to create and then record a "confrontation" with the candidate. While Miller attempted to calmly exit the facility, the blogger physically assaulted another individual and made threatening gestures and movements towards the candidate.

At that point, the security personnel had to take action and intervened and detained the irrational blogger, whose anger overcame him."

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Funny - Is this a US Senator, or an "after" photo from an anti-meth PSA?

by the Left Coast Rebel

Last night I met Mary who runs the
BeJohnGalt site. She had left a nice comment at my PJM piece and I checked out her link. Anyway she has a great Randian-centerred, 'small-l', libertarian leaning blog that you should check out. Her father writes a must-read "Price of Freedom" column every week at the site too. She's also a resident of the People's Republic of California.

This morning Mary emailed me and mentioned something funny that she and her compatriots had cooked up. It's a new
Lisa Murkowski site. The URL is http://www.lisamurkwski.com/.

The site is oh-not-so-flattering to Lisa Murksowski (without an 'O' in the last name, check the URL above), screenshot (click to embiggen):

Now that is funny! Cross posted to LCR.

Monday, September 20, 2010

AK Senate Race: McAdams Endorses Murkowski?


Chicago-style politics in Alaska...

After her defeat in the GOP primary, incumbent Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski jumped back into the headlines by launching a write-in campaign. Her chance of winning is almost exactly zero, but if she's lucky, she could hand the race to the Democrat.

Interestingly, in Thursday's debate between the Democrat, Scott McAdams and Joe Miller, the Tea Party Republican, McAdams had nothing but good things to say about his write-in "opponent." Is Scott McAdams' statement tantamount to an endorsement? Watch and listen:


"I welcome [Murkowski]. I think she's a classy person with a good voice. I don't think that she is a liberal, as she has been framed as being. I think she is an Alaskan first and a party person second..."

"I think it's better for Alaska if Senator Murkowski has a dialog in the room..."

"If Senator Murkowski joins this thing, I welcome her. Her (sic) and I made an oath to one another that we would have a civic (sic), principled dialog on the issues, that we wouldn't lie about each other, that we wouldn't tear each other down..."

"If she does enter [the race], I hope that either Senator Murkowski or myself (sic) are the next Senator for the State of Alaska."

[emphasis added]

Aren't McAdams and Murkowski getting a little too cozy in this race?

Lisa Murkowski says she jumped back into the race as a write-in candidate to give Alaskans "a choice." But she's not really a choice. As a write-in candidate, her only chance at a meaningful impact on the race is to siphon off enough votes to sabotage Joe Miller. Murkowski knows she's only giving the Democrat a chance to win.

This exemplifies the problem with liberal Republicans.

Lexington Green over at Chicago Boyz provides brilliant analysis by introducing the idea of the Combine

:

In Illinois, there has long been an expression which describes the relationship between the two political parties: The Combine. Chicago Tribune writer John Kass seems to have originated this expression. See, for example, this article: In Combine, cash is king, corruption is bipartisan. Kass quoted former Illinois Senator Peter Fitzgerald: “In the final analysis, The Combine’s allegiance is not to a party, but to their pocketbooks. They’re about making money off the taxpayers,” Fitzgerald said. Kass went on: “He should know. He fought The Combine and lost, and the empty suits running the Republican Party encourage their friendly scribes to blame the social conservatives for the disaster of the state GOP.”

Sound familiar?

America, welcome to Illinois.

The way it works is this. The Democrat party is the senior member of the Combine. The GOP is the junior member of the Combine. The game is exactly the same, and whoever is up, or whoever is down, based on the random behavior of those rubes, the voters, does not matter. The game is always exactly the same, and the people who are in on the game, from either party, have a shared stake in defending the game.

The Combine is a term that should be more widely used in Illinois. It is also a word that should be more widely used in the USA in general.

Lisa Murkowski’s family, and her career, exist because of the Combine. Her interest is in preserving the existing game. She is preserving her stake and her family’s stake in a game they have benefitted from. There is no mystery about this at all. There is no need for psychiatry to understand why she is trying to stop Joe Miller. He threatens the game. It has nothing to do with the label “Republican.”.

This is why the Tea Party exists...to break up the Combine.
T
oo many of our politicians would fit just as comfortably in the Democratic Party as they would in the GOP. They'll go anywhere the quest for power takes them.

The political establishment on both sides of the aisle believes that it is above the law (i.e. the Constitution); and as the fight over ObamaCare revealed, the pols hardly feel the need to concern themselves with the will of the people either.

If the past 21 months opened up any room for doubt about the fact that the GOP is free from the burdens of principle, the statist Republican leadership laid those doubts to rest last week.
Concern trolls like Karl the Cannibal demonstrated a greater fear for the threat of unapproved conservative insurgents than for the disastrous policies of their "opponents" in the other party.

T
his, in turn, confirms the fears of the grassroots: the GOP tent, as it is currently configured, is not big enough for more conservatives.
Fortunately, the cannibalism confirms something else as well. Conservatives now know with certainty that their primary season gambles were prudent, for it is better to take chances with unproven Tea Party conservatives than to go with consistently untrustworthy establishment hacks. Chris Matthews, of all people, understands this quite well:

"If the plan of those in power is to raise a ton of cash and run nasty TV ads saying you can't vote for this new person, that he or she is flawed, I expect the voter will say, 'Are you telling me I have no choice but to vote for you? Are you saying that I, this little voter out here, dare not take a chance on someone who has not yet let me down, as you have? If that is what you're telling me, that I have no choice... well Mr. Big Stuff, you just have to wait, stay up late election night and see what I have done.'''

Let there be no mistake. Neither Republican elitists nor Democratic elitists are happy with the defeat of liberal GOP incumbents. Now there's a chance (albeit a small one in some cases) that Conservatives will take more power from the Combine.


Update:

They keep pushing.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Ten Buck Fridays: September 19 - 24


I think you'll like the candidates featured in this week's TBF poll. Who is your favorite?

*To ensure that your vote is counted, vote before you view results:

Poll closes 3:00 A.M. Eastern on 9/24
Bl
og
gers: Share this poll. Results will be cumulative!

*Note: Vote only once. Duplicate votes WILL BE DELETED. This is not a contest to determine who can click on a mouse the most.


Meet the candidates...

Bruce Brown (CA-35)
David Harmer (CA-11)
Jesse Kelly (AZ-08)
Bill Marcy (MS-02)
Joe Miller (AK-Sen)
Kristi Noem (SD-AL)
Rick Tubbs (CA-07)

Very good reference: The Top 50 Races YOU Can Help to Win.

Check this out too: http://www.40seats.com/

And be sure not to miss this: Twenty Candidates Who Need Help - Jim Geraghty - National Review Online

The TBF poll in a nutshell: This is a poll designed to promote rising conservative stars. At the end of the week, the winner will be promoted by a nationwide network of over 80 conservative blogs and will receive a flurry of contributions from patriots across the country.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

RINO Murkowski Out!


As the MSM has duly noted, with her concession speech tonight, Lisa Murkowski (RINO-AK) became the third Senator to be booted from office this year, joining Bob Bennett (RINO-UT) and Arlen Specter (Turncoat-PA).

The MSM will tell you that this is a bad year for incumbents. If there's a kernal of truth to that assesment, it's only because a majority of D.C. incumbents stand with the Obama administration. The real lesson to take from the death of these incumbencies is that it's a bad year for politicians who are insufficiently prepared to stand in the way of the Obama-Reid-Pelosi agenda.

Lisa Murkowski was beaten by Joe Miller, a conservative Tea Party Republican who emphasized Murkowski's unwillingness to repeal ObamaCare.

Liberal Republican Bob Bennett was beaten by Mike Lee, a conservative who who ran against Bailout Bob's fiscal irresponsibility.

Arlen Specter (D) was beaten by Joe Sestak, a Democrat who has been a thorn in the Obama administration's side. Sestak, in turn, will likely be beaten by a hardcore DeMint conservative, Pat Toomey.

If this year's primaries serve as a reliable indicator of things to come, November 2 will be a bad day not for incumbents in general, but specifically for incumbents who stand too close to Obama.


Cross-posted at Left Coast Rebel
Read the report from The Other McCain here. (h/t LCR)
More from Memeorandum

Update I: Attention Republicans! Stand firm against ObamaCare unless you want to destroy yourself politically:


A word to the wise is sufficient.

Here's what a Murkowski fan thinks about Joe Miller's successful effort to point out Murkowski's weak response to ObamaCare:

"Murkowski's response was a good one: that Joe Miller's claim was an outright lie and that she voted several times to repeal portions of Obamacare and co-sponsored other pieces of legislation to do the same."

Sorry, repealing portions of ObamaCare isn't good enough.


Update II: Interesting tweets on the topic...
  • @ewerickson: "The Murkowski defeat is also a near total kneecapping of Mitch McConnell, whose leadership team is Gregg, Bennett, Murkowski, and Hutchison."
  • @micellemalkin: "Ousted GOP Sen. Bob Bennett has company: AK Sen. Murkowski joins the lib Repub retiree club! http://tinyurl.com/2wmht2e"
  • @pourmecoffee: Murkowski concedes. As I understand Alaska politics, she now becomes millionaire celebrity and rules world from Facebook.
  • @sarahpalinusa Do you believe in miracles?! http://u.nu/72z2f Congratulations, @JoeWMiller! Thank you for your service, Sen. Murkowski. On to November!
  • @ewerickson: How much worse will a lame duck session be with Murkowski, Bennett, Gregg, McCain et al having nothing to lose?

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Primary Highlights


Exciting results from yesterday's Primary elections...

Biggest shocker of the night: In a huge surprise to all the pundits who are still struggling to appreciate the magnitude of America's opposition to the radical Obama agenda, Lisa Murkowski was trailing Joe Miller by 3.6 points with over three quarters of the precincts reporting. Murkowski was expected to use her incumbent RINO establi$hment advantage to easily overcome her pro-abortion, pro-ObamaCare handicaps, but this year is not a good one for liberals on either side of the isle, GOP or Dem.

There might be a very long wait for final results.

A good night for Marco Rubio: Out of 1,252,494 votes cast in the GOP Senate primary, 1,059,193 went to Rubio. On the Dems' side, Kendrick Meek took 57% of the total (522,982/909,307). These results are good news for conservatives for a number of reasons.

First, conservative Rubio got more votes than all of the Democrats combined. That bodes well for Rubio's strength in November. Second, a victory for Meek (as opposed to the other Democrat) makes it easier for Rubio to win in the general election vs. Crist and the Dem. Third, if a single GOP candidate can bring in more votes in his non-competitive primary election than two Democrats can draw in a hotly contested parallel battle, widespread concerns over the Dems' midterm apathy appear to be very well placed.

Another important election in Florida: A big ObamaCare foe, Rick Scott, upset an establishment Republican for the win in Florida's GOP gubernatorial primary. A health care executive who founded Conservatives for Patient's Rights, Rick Scott would be a formidable force for repeal of ObamaCare as governor of the "Medicare State," but he does carry some old baggage.

Finally in Florida, Daniel Webster has been anointed to take on the #1 evil-monger in Congress, Alan Grayson.

Our primary roundup would not be complete without mentioning Feingold McCain. Unfortunately, after spending almost $100 billion to win the primary, McCain walked away with 56% of the vote. This ensures another 6 years of the Maverick, who will be 80 years old the next time Arizonans vote to force us to endure another 6 years of the uber-RINO.

Speaking of McCain, don't miss the analysis at The Other McCain's primary HQ.


More



Democratic party spokesman can't name Alaska Democrat running for Senate

Tidbit: The National Republican Senatorial Committee advised Murkowski to attack her conservative opponent early. (This is why we have TBF.)

JammieWearingFool: The Palin effect

RightKlik circa November 2008: "Palin will be a tremendous asset to the conservative movement for many years to come... If there is anyone who can help turn out the conservative base, in a close race, in a red state, where conservative turnout is likely to tip the scales, Sarah Palin is the one."

Another Flashback (from Matthew Newman): Joe Miller, giant slayer.

Reader comments welcome...

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Ten Buck Fridays: August 15 - 20


Another week in the war against the radical left-wing agenda. Which soldier needs our help the most?

Bloggers: Share this poll. Results will be cumulative!

Poll closes at 12:01 A.M. on Friday.


Sorry about the "no-frills" weekend here at RightKlik. I've been called away from the political front to participate in some intense capitalist activity.